Answers to common objections to delayed cord clamping

Most Bradley students include in their birth plan that they desire delayed cord clamping. Sometimes they are met with objections from their birth team. Here is an article, siting recent research, that pediatrician Mark Sloan, MD wrote refuting common objections.

Unclamped cord over the course of 15 minutes

Please click on the title to read the full article.

Common Objections to Delayed Cord Clamping – What’s The Evidence Say?

November 13th, 2012 by Sharon Muza

Goto commentsLeave a comment

by Mark Sloan M.D.

Today’s guest post is written by Dr. Mark Sloan, pediatrician and author of Birth Day: A Pediatrician Explores the Science, the History and the Wonder of Childbirth.  Dr. Sloan shares information and current research on delayed cord clamping after birth, in a helpful Q&A style format that consumers and professionals can use to discuss this important topic.

_____________________

photo credit pattiramos.com

Many maternity care providers continue to clamp the umbilical cord immediately after an uncomplicated vaginal birth, even though the significant neonatal benefits of delayed cord clamping (usually defined as 2 to 3 minutes after birth) are now well known.

In some cases this continued practice is due to a misunderstanding of placental physiology in the first few minutes after birth. In others, human nature plays a role: We are often reluctant to change the way we were taught to do things, even in the face of clear evidence that contradicts that teaching.

Though there is no strong scientific support for immediate cord clamping (ICC), entrenched medical habits can be glacially slow in changing. Here are some often-heard objections to delayed cord clamping (DCC), and how an advocate for delayed clamping might respond to them: